top of page
1.jpg

How to Beat a S-e-x Crime Allegation in California?

The emergence of social media and sensationalist journalism has brought c-h-i-l-d s-e-x offenses to the forefront of public knowledge; there's a kid predator around every turn Sex Crime Allegation in California. These tales seldom mention a stranger in a trench coat scouring the streets at night federal sex crimes. Accused abusers are often family friends, relatives, fathers, stepfathers, teachers, counselors, etc. The closer the claimed victim and the accused are, the more difficult the case; a pre-existing relationship increases the potential of ulterior intentions by the accuser. In Nashville, a youngster faked assault claims against her father to live with her mother. The mother's child support would double. A woman may face similar claims if an adolescent brags about dating an older lady. In all the sensationalist headlines, details are lost, and the accused– even the wrongfully accused– face an uphill struggle legally and in the public eye. False allegations happen despite popular opinion.

 

S-e-x-u-a-l assault claims are difficult to defend. In d-r-u-g trafficking, theft, and white collar offenses, juries seek corroborating evidence. While press and social media sensationalize these incidents, juries can usually analyze subtleties more easily than in s-e-x-u-a-l assault trials. In those cases, appearance generally trumps substantiated evidence. Uncorroborated juvenile testimony can lead to life in jail. Police and social workers sometimes begin their fields as advocates for the victim rather than neutral investigators. This mindset extends to jurors, who want to be seen as supporters of kid victims and won't risk letting a guilty individual go to tarnish that reputation sex crimes attorney. These situations invite these views, often to the disadvantage of the wrongfully accused. Because of the above factors, the accused may feel hopeless in challenging these allegations, and defense options may not be clear. We've compiled a collection of tactics and practices to aid with uphill fights.

 

Get a defense attorney involved immediately in order to investigate.

 

The criminal justice system seldom admits mistakes. It's simpler to prevent charges from being brought than to dismiss them after they're filed. Investigators and social workers may have a natural, inherent prejudice, but it's usually unconscious and not established through malice: they're not out to harm innocent people. If a defense counsel provides them with exculpatory proof, they may change their minds. Pre-file or preliminary inquiry is a smart technique to get charges withdrawn. Consider how frequently a child may tell the same tale to counselors, psychiatrists, a trusted adult, police, or investigators: a story, once told and recounted, might be deemed reality, making it difficult to discover the truth. It forces the defendant to challenge an established truth rather than letting the facts speak for themselves. Involving a lawyer early can help. When a defense counsel has access to the accuser, it might be beneficial to the client. In Nashville, a 10-year-old said she observed her stepfather "French kissing" her sister. The defendant's counsel found that the 10-year-old couldn't explain French kissing. Why use the phrase if she didn't know what it meant? The inquiry found that the girl's biological father taught her to use particular phrases to acquire custody. A jury would often condemn a client on the grounds that a youngster couldn't know particular terminology unless brutally exposed to them. With more knowledge available at a younger age and people educating youngsters in s-e-x-u-a-l vocabulary and phrases, cases like the ten-year-old are probably more prevalent than we think.

Subscribe Form

Thanks for subscribing!

bottom of page